- Company Articles
- Products and Technology
- Solution
- Cross-Border E-Commerce Warehouses: Rack C for International Logistics
Traditional Storage vs. Rack C: A Cross-Border Warehouse Showdown
| Feature | Traditional Steel Racks | Basic Wooden Shelves | Rack C (Aluminum Profile) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Space Utilization | Fixed heights waste vertical space; bulky frames take up floor area. | Low weight capacity limits vertical stacking; prone to warping. | Adjustable shelves maximize vertical space; slim aluminum frames save floor area. |
| Durability | Heavy and strong but prone to rust in humid ports. | Cheap upfront but rots, cracks, or bends under heavy loads. | Aluminum profile resists corrosion; withstands heavy loads and frequent reconfigurations. |
| FIFO Compliance | No built-in flow; requires manual rotation of stock (time-consuming). | Hard to track stock rotation; risk of expired/obsolete inventory. | Integrates with flow rack rollers for automatic FIFO; reduces stock waste by 30%+. |
| Integration with Conveyors | Difficult to align with conveyors; requires extra labor to move goods. | Not designed for mechanized workflows; slows down order picking. | Modular design fits seamlessly with conveyors; cuts picking time by 25%. |
| Cost Over Time | High upfront cost; maintenance (rust treatment) adds long-term expenses. | Low upfront cost but needs frequent replacement (every 1-2 years). | Moderate upfront cost; no maintenance; lasts 10+ years with proper use. |